[pedonbio]

There's a chance I posted this image already, but I'm too pressed for time to search through the entire thread page by page, so here it is again. I don't assert that the woman is Suzanne Pritchard, but merely say she looks like her. Any/all opinions are welcome.

And while you're at it, in this IDQ thread about 'Cara' http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php/topic,9980182.0.html I was thinking maybe she's Suzanne with a wig. There too any/all opinions are entirely welcome.

Every time I visit this thread I become more convinced that it is her...

----------

[Zorro]

I rarely upload any morphs to other strings, but I just had to upload this one!

[Palomine]

Getting past the obvious: yes, the way she's just barely peeking at the camera from behind her perfectly pulchritudinous bosom is very appealing... goodness knows seeing her like that fills my head with all sorts of ideas, the foremost among them involving my tongue and that rarely-seen patch of skin where the underside of her breasts meet her ribcage.

Once you've had a moment to take all of Suzanne's glorious goodness in, let you eye wander up and to the left a bit and tell me what the hell that THING above the couch is supposed to be. Some kind of stuffed animal to be sure, but what?

[pedonbio]

Once you've had a moment to take all of Suzanne's glorious goodness in, let you eye wander up and to the left a bit and tell me what the hell that THING above the couch is supposed to be. Some kind of stuffed animal to be sure, but what?

Oh, my! For once I have an answer. Starting about 1965, and for ten years, stuffed toys in the form of large snakes were very popular. I think Cabbage Patch Kidz squeezed them out.

Mod edit to say ! It seems you are correct sir... I thought it had to be a snake, but the pig-nose threw me off.

But really, ANY excuse to post a pic of Suzanne. -Pal

[Palomine]

I guess what makes this image 'rare' is her bottomlessness. I'm in favor female bottomlessness in general, and very enthusiastic about it in regards to Suzanne. I'm not certain, but I don't think I've seen other photos from this shoot (yet).

[Palomine]

Not sure whether we've seen this photo before... I think not, but am far from sure. It's hard to do better than 'lush and adorable' IMO.

[pedonbio]

   Still looking...

[tdotter]

I saw on a site where a few people were selling their collection of Suzanne's pictures.Every collection had the same number of pictures as being 276.Does this sound right?
Is 276 the number of pictures of her that is out there or is that figure too low?

[pedonbio]

I saw on a site where a few people were selling their collection of Suzanne's pictures.Every collection had the same number of pictures as being 276.Does this sound right?
Is 276 the number of pictures of her that is out there or is that figure too low?

I suspect you have one seller with one collection trying to sell in multiple markets.

[tdotter]

Look at her face

[Palomine]

Look at her face

I did. It's all closed eyes (in presumably feigned, but still appealing, ecstasy), jaw-achingly open mouth, plump natural breasts with large dark areolas and if those damn panties weren't in the way I'd suspect sweetly beckoning and pouty labia minora.

Dear Glob,
WHY OH WHY
can't we dig up some hitherto unearthed treasure trove of shockingly graphic 8mm hardcore of Miss Prichard?  
I've zero doubt that she was fuck3d as fervently and enthusiastically as Gianna Michaels or Hitomi Tanaka, and I'm almost as certain that some of that was done in front of a camera (going by the odds) ...so somewhere, out there, such material must exist. Or so my addled, Fox Mulderesque brain insists.

I'm almost sure that we (or I) have posted the attached photo before (or some version of it) but on the remote chance we haven't (and for the benefit of newbies who can't be bothered to scroll back through threads to their origins) I'll do so again. As usual, you'd think that any particular part of Suzanne, though lovely, would in and of itself not be spectacularly remarkable. But then you pull back to take in the sum total of those parts: the bangs, the dark eyes, the wide toothy smile, the lush almost primal figure... and THEN you're irreversibly smitten  (or at least I am ).

Her smile and crinkly areolas are (of course) what draws me to this particular image. Some girls never get like that, no matter how much attention you pay to them, nor how cold it gets. Other girls... they get like Suzanne is pictured here and the feel of that in your mouth... against your tongue... is perhaps as close to epiphany as most of us will ever come.

[tdotter]

 

[Palomine]

An unusually-posed photo of Ms. Pritchard that I hope/think we all haven't seen before. While this particular contorted point-of-view might be somewhat less than flattering for some models, Suzanne manages to appear irresistible (as always). Rarely has the roof of a woman's mouth ever been such an erotic focal point, to say nothing of the delightfully wide gap between her thighs (you just know there's a meaty delight hiding beneath that thin strip of panty). Then one takes in her lush, shapely thighs and the soft rounded undersides of her sweet ass cheeks. Finally, the gaze comes to rest on her unique and miraculous (practically trademarked) bosom, sloshing hypnotically over her rib cage. Ah, Suzanne....

[Palomine]

There's no end to the angles from which Suzanne radiates appeal.

[Palomine]

Something different today... this is a still frame from the only video (I think) that I've seen of Suzanne Pritchard (info in the file name). There must be more (video) out there somewhere... even if she limited herself to layouts for photographers, burlesque work and (apparently) some public appearances, 8mm cameras weren't as ubiquitous as cameraphones are today, but there were plenty around.