*

pulp

  • Banned User
  • 697
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #105 on: August 23, 2002, 03:51:16 PM »
what do you mean by:
"WHEN THE HELL DID LINSEY GET A REDUCTION???? "
There was no mention of that was there? OMG no!

*

MrHHH

  • L Cup
  • 2985
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #106 on: August 23, 2002, 03:57:36 PM »
There's a picture in there where her bust looks pretty small. It may come as a shock to you, but natural breasts are soft and can be easily covered up in a loose shirt. Like the one that's she's wearing.

She made her fortune off of her breasts. I doubt she's going to ever have them reduced unless she has to.

I'm still curious to see what her rates are though.  

*

Seelie

  • G Cup
  • 739
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #107 on: August 23, 2002, 09:19:44 PM »
In reply to:

I'm still curious to see what her rates are though.


Well, based on the rates posted at the place Melonie linked to, if she's competitively priced it's 1,500 - 2,000 per hour.
-----
Hmm, I guess I'm not as omniscient as I thought.

*

Bad Irving

  • C Cup
  • 63
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #108 on: August 24, 2002, 12:27:01 AM »
Holly crap, you may find this surpriseing.  I have read about DOZENS of big busted CENTERFOLDS and yet, haven't hirered a single one as an escort.

Damn, I guess I just love FREE instead.

:-P

--Bad Irving  

*

MrHHH

  • L Cup
  • 2985
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #109 on: August 24, 2002, 09:01:40 AM »
Huh?  

*

Seelie

  • G Cup
  • 739
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #110 on: August 24, 2002, 01:05:39 PM »
I think that Chili's the only regular who's admitted to using such services. And when he wrote that article for Behavior about it, no one responded and he decided to not talk about it anymore.
-----
Hmm, I guess I'm not as omniscient as I thought.

Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #111 on: August 24, 2002, 04:58:10 PM »
thats got to be the best hiding of breasts ive ever seen.  

*

SAMU

  • BANNED USER
  • 290
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #112 on: August 24, 2002, 09:36:47 PM »
Looks to me like she got a reduction and lipo on her legs, inner thighs and ass too. Pity <o,><o>. Why Lordy why?Waaahhh.
SAMU

*

turbo

  • Z Cup
  • 3290
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #113 on: August 25, 2002, 12:18:04 PM »
Yea, it's a real kick in the teeth to find out that a number of porn stars are not really different from full blown prostitutes. It seems that these women are unblushing participants in the carnal circus that is "escorting".

I wonder if the porn industry primes and preps these women for lucrative careers in mattress dancing? I have always thought that people who do porn were either exhibitionists or  decidedly damaged in some way and needed to dramatize or wrestle with their demons before a camera. On the other hand, this "escorting" business seems to be about nothing but the money.

I thought I was past the point of being shocked until a recent episode of "Insomniac with Dave Attel" aired on the Comedy Channel. Attel was visiting the sites around Reno, Nevada and stopped by the world infamous BUNNY RANCH. I was very surprised to see former porn stars Ruby and Airforce Amy identified as working on the ranch as "house whores".
 
In the end I know that these women have to pass food through their bowels just like everyone else but it is disheartening just the same.        
---------- "I will be acquitted and vindicated when the truth is told." Michael Jackson before the trial------------
---------- "Justice was done. He was always innocent and we proved it." Thomas Mesereau after the trial-------

*

thcbl

  • G Cup
  • 1075
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #114 on: August 25, 2002, 02:15:54 PM »
Ummm . . . yes, shirts can hide the size of breasts, but . . . I really doubt that is what is happening in that picture.

I have seen lots of pictures of her posed the same way, and her breasts are naturally wide . . . you would see them pushing out the sides of her shirt.

In that picture, it looks like they are around the DD cup range.

Please say it aint so.

Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #115 on: August 25, 2002, 02:56:21 PM »
seriously, is the term "escorting" just legal cover nowadays for women to sell their "other" services?  i thought that "escorts" keep it strictly to their business code if you know what i mean, and never offer anything on top of that.  

*

F_Cup_Fitzgerald

  • Banned User
  • 3590
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #116 on: August 25, 2002, 08:51:46 PM »
Don't forget about the healthy cut off the top for the model's pimp . . . er, I mean "business manager." Or "promoter."  

*

Seelie

  • G Cup
  • 739
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #117 on: August 25, 2002, 09:06:04 PM »
I always figured that escorting was a euphemism for **31**.
-----
Hmm, I guess I'm not as omniscient as I thought.

*

melonie_charm

  • G Cup
  • 1145
    • www.meloniecharm.com
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #118 on: August 25, 2002, 11:03:38 PM »
C'mon, guys, everybody in the adult entertainment industry is first and foremost an ADULT, meaning everyone is free to make their own choices.  While I would personally never be comfortable offering sex for money, I have absolutely nothing against girls who choose to.  In fact I respect them greatly, because they have the "balls" to do it and the honesty to publicise the fact that they are doing it.  The only time I get somewhat upset is when girls are not 'honest' about what they are actually doing.

The important point here is not the fact that escorting activities are taking place, it's that the current state of affairs in the big boob industry has deteriorated to the point that XXX and/or escorting activities and/or "private shows" are virtually the only remaining reliable sources of major income!  This is just one more reason that it's unlikely you'll be seeing many new huge boobed models come onto the scene.

Think about it - if a girl has virtually no options other than to do XXX and/or escort and/or do "private shows" in order to earn major income, and that income is going to be major whether or not she invests immense amounts of money and takes major health risks to achieve a huge bustline, she has little to gain and much to lose in pursuing huge implants.  But at least today the girls know this situation exists.  Girls who made the investment and took the risks in order to get huge implants a few years ago did so in a different big bust business climate ... there was still a Boob Cruise, the feature circuit clubs were still bursting with guys who couldn't wait to see huge busted stars shake and bake live on stage, there were at least 5 major big bust magazines, big boobs on the net was still growing by leaps and bounds etc. (pardon the pun please).   These girls, like myself, held reasonable expectations that the income possibilities would remain substantial based on their bustlines alone.  However this situation began to deteriorate right along with the US economy.

Let me put it this way - I would not want to be facing a big mortgage payment, a new car payment, and a plastic surgeon's payment right now, because it's extremely doubtful that I could meet these kinds of monthly bills without resorting to XXX and/or escorting and/or "private shows" to bolster income back to levels which could be achieved by just modeling, featuring and websites a few years back.  With a handful of exceptions perhaps, I would assume that many girls now doing XXX and/or escorting and/or "private shows" are not doing it out of sheer pleasure, but rather because it is virtually the only reliable option still remaining which pays sufficiently well to cover their financial needs.

*

taacct2

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 16
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #119 on: August 26, 2002, 01:29:56 AM »
Linsey has been advertised on some escort websites in England for a while, and everyone says that it is just a scam.  You hire her but someone else shows up.

I'll believe Linsey escorts when her contact info in on www.linseysworld.com.....